<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Gear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thephotojourney.com/2009/02/11/my-gear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thephotojourney.com/2009/02/11/my-gear/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:41:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotojourney.com/2009/02/11/my-gear/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotojourney.com/?p=198#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Thanks Suzanne. I did a fai bit of research into the 50mm&lt;em&gt; f&lt;/em&gt;1.4 v the&lt;em&gt; f&lt;/em&gt;1.8.

Main difference other than the larger aperture is the build quality. the 1.8 is mostly plastic while the 1.4 is a metal build.  I have found the 1.8 strong enough but I wouldn&#039;t be throwing it around if I was you. 

As far as the larger aperture 1.8 is more than enough for great portrait shots. The bigger the aperture the more room for error and resulting in soft images. You mainly want to set your focus point to the persons leading eye. 

I&#039;d save the extra $300 and buy the 1.8. Then spend the left over cash on a nice flash or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Suzanne. I did a fai bit of research into the 50mm<em> f</em>1.4 v the<em> f</em>1.8.</p>
<p>Main difference other than the larger aperture is the build quality. the 1.8 is mostly plastic while the 1.4 is a metal build.  I have found the 1.8 strong enough but I wouldn&#8217;t be throwing it around if I was you. </p>
<p>As far as the larger aperture 1.8 is more than enough for great portrait shots. The bigger the aperture the more room for error and resulting in soft images. You mainly want to set your focus point to the persons leading eye. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d save the extra $300 and buy the 1.8. Then spend the left over cash on a nice flash or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Gogolin</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotojourney.com/2009/02/11/my-gear/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Gogolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotojourney.com/?p=198#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott,

Great site.
I am having a dilemma about the Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II and the Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM Lenses for the 40D.
I know the cannon EF 50mm F1.8 II lens is cheaper than the EF 50mm F1.4 USM. 
Do you think it is worth paying the extra for the more expensive lens? Looking at a lens for portraits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott,</p>
<p>Great site.<br />
I am having a dilemma about the Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II and the Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM Lenses for the 40D.<br />
I know the cannon EF 50mm F1.8 II lens is cheaper than the EF 50mm F1.4 USM.<br />
Do you think it is worth paying the extra for the more expensive lens? Looking at a lens for portraits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GioSico</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotojourney.com/2009/02/11/my-gear/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>GioSico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotojourney.com/?p=198#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Dude get with Ubuntu ... congrats on the site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude get with Ubuntu &#8230; congrats on the site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 510/516 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.thephotojourney.com @ 2012-02-06 01:50:41 -->
